Re: pg_upgrade: Improve invalid option handling

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Improve invalid option handling
Date: 2019-06-19 02:24:11
Message-ID: 20190619022358.GB17450@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:25:44AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Correct, that matches how pg_basebackup and psql does it.

Perhaps you have a patch at hand? I can see four strings in
pg_upgrade, two in exec.c and two in option.c, which could be
improved.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-19 02:28:16 Re: openssl valgrind failures on skink are due to openssl issue
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-19 02:19:31 Re: Still some references to configure-time WAL segment size option in msvc scripts