| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? |
| Date: | 2019-06-10 22:11:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20190610221135.GA7974@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Jun-09, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I think it should say:
>
> | Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> | divided is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough
I opined elsewhere in the thread that this phrase can be made into more
straightforward English:
Choosing the target number of partitions THAT the table should be
divided INTO is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough
What do you think of that formulation?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-06-10 23:07:52 | Re: pg_dump: fail to restore partition table with serial type |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-06-10 22:00:47 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |