Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date: 2019-06-09 05:11:01
Message-ID: 20190609051101.GI3079@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 05:07:39PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 16:21, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > I meant it should say "into which it should be divided" and not "by which it
> > should be divided INTO", which has too many prepositions. This is still an
> > issue:
>
> It now reads "divided by" instead of "divided into".

Sorry, but I think this is still an issue:

> Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> divided by is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough

I think it should say:

| Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
| divided is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-06-09 05:18:01 Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-06-09 05:07:39 Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?