From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL |
Date: | 2019-05-21 17:38:57 |
Message-ID: | 20190521173857.GH28936@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> That seems too confusing.
> >
> > > Ok. Are you voting for using EXEC as a keyword to replace ANALYZE?
> >
> > FWIW, given the conflict against "EXPLAIN EXECUTE prepared_stmt_name",
> > we should probably just drop the whole idea. It seemed like a great
> > idea at the time, but it's going to confuse people not just Bison.
>
> +1. I think trying to replace ANALYZE with something else is setting
> ourselves up for years, possibly decades, worth of confusion. And
> without any real benefit.
>
> Defaulting BUFFERS to ON is probably a reasonable change, thuogh.
Would this be worth back-patching? I ask because adding it will cause
fairly large (if mechanical) churn in the regression tests.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-21 17:41:02 | Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish |
Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2019-05-21 17:27:01 | Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish |