| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL |
| Date: | 2019-05-21 17:47:44 |
| Message-ID: | 17410.1558460864@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Defaulting BUFFERS to ON is probably a reasonable change, thuogh.
> Would this be worth back-patching? I ask because adding it will cause
> fairly large (if mechanical) churn in the regression tests.
It really doesn't matter how much churn it causes in the regression tests.
Back-patching a significant non-bug behavioral change like that is exactly
the kind of thing we don't do, because it will cause our users pain.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2019-05-21 17:57:25 | Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-21 17:41:02 | Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish |