Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting
Date: 2019-05-10 15:33:23
Message-ID: 20190510153323.GA4967@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-May-10, Julien Rouhaud wrote:

> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> > Patch is good as far as it goes, but I wonder if it'd be smarter to
> > convert the function's "type" argument from a string to an enum,
> > and then replace the if/else chains with switches?
>
> I've also thought about it. I think the reason why type argument was
> kept as a string is that reindex_one_database is doing:
>
> appendPQExpBufferStr(&sql, type);
>
> to avoid an extra switch to append the textual reindex type. I don't
> have a strong opinion on whether to change that on master or not.

I did have the same thought. It seem clear now that we should do it :-)
ISTM that the way to fix that problem is to use the proposed enum
everywhere and turn it into a string when generating the SQL command,
not before.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-10 15:38:57 Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-05-10 15:18:11 Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting