Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date: 2019-05-01 16:14:15
Message-ID: 20190501161415.py5i3b6cjycpv2nq@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-04-06 16:13:53 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 11:31:31AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Yes, but Fujii-san pointed out that this option doesn't support toast
> > tables and I think there is not specific reason why not supporting
> > them. So it might be good to add toast.vacuum_index_cleanup. Attached
> > patch.
>
> Being able to control that option at toast level sounds sensible. I
> have added an open item about that.

Robert, what is your stance on this open item? It's been an open item
for about three weeks, without any progress.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-05-01 16:15:06 Re: pgsql: Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-05-01 16:11:51 Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation