Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date: 2019-04-29 03:58:47
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:14:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
> subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
> for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

Thanks for letting me know about those MUAs.

> I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all,
> because the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with
> the same subject line but no embedded patch. Like this one. So
> it's just noise with no information content worth noticing.


David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2019-04-29 04:11:06 Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql
Previous Message Daurnimator 2019-04-29 03:56:02 Re: BUG #15708: RLS 'using' running as wrong user when called from a view