Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date: 2019-04-28 17:14:01
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all, because
the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with the same subject
line but no embedded patch. Like this one. So it's just noise with no
information content worth noticing.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-04-28 17:14:59 Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Previous Message Noah Misch 2019-04-28 17:00:11 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o