From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE |
Date: | 2019-04-25 19:08:36 |
Message-ID: | 20190425190836.GA6844@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Apr-26, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:04 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I also wonder if
> > defining the structs in the way you do is the most sensible arrangement.
>
> I did that arrangement because the format of PREPARE TRANSACTION record,
> i.e., that struct, also needs to be accessed in backend and frontend.
> But, of course, if there is smarter way, I'm happy to adopt that!
I don't know. I spent some time staring at the code involved, and it
seems it'd be possible to improve just a little bit on cleanliness
grounds, with a lot of effort, but not enough practical value.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-25 19:28:52 | Re: jsonpath |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-04-25 19:05:47 | Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD |