| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2019-04-16 06:19:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20190416061900.GI2673@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's
> the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place).
After thinking some more on it, this behavior looks rather sensible to
me. Are there any objections?
> However, the doc patch lost the trailing paren:
Fixed on my branch, thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-16 06:45:12 | Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-16 06:13:00 | Re: Accidental setting of XLogReaderState.private_data ? |