From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange coding in mvdistinct.c |
Date: | 2019-04-15 22:35:41 |
Message-ID: | 20190415223541.63ayu2aztt4qqh3l@development |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Oh, and as I continue to grep, I found this in dependencies.c:
>
> dependencies = (MVDependencies *) repalloc(dependencies,
> offsetof(MVDependencies, deps)
> + dependencies->ndeps * sizeof(MVDependency));
>
>I'm pretty sure this is an actual bug: the calculation should be
>
> offsetof(MVDependencies, deps)
> + dependencies->ndeps * sizeof(MVDependency *));
>
>because deps is an array of MVDependency* not MVDependency.
>
>This would lead to an overallocation not underallocation, and it's
>probably pretty harmless because ndeps can't get too large (I hope;
>if it could, this would have O(N^2) performance problems). Still,
>you oughta fix it.
>
>(There's a similar calculation later in the file that gets it right.)
>
Thanks. I noticed some of the bugs while investigating the recent MCV
serialization, and I plan to fix them soon. This week, hopefully.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-04-16 00:17:05 | Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-15 22:12:24 | Re: Strange coding in mvdistinct.c |