Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE
Date: 2019-04-16 00:17:05
Message-ID: 1c54deb6-db10-3679-2f9e-e52c5ccc94dd@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/04/16 5:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Attached updated patch.
>
> LGTM, pushed.

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-04-16 01:03:03 Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-04-15 22:35:41 Re: Strange coding in mvdistinct.c