Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Date: 2019-04-10 11:09:22
Message-ID: 20190410110922.GE2728@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 05:03:21PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> The problem lies in all branches that have partitioning, so it should be
> listed under Older Bugs, right? You may have noticed that I posted
> patches for all branches down to 10.

I have noticed. The message from Tom upthread outlined that an open
item should be added, but this is not one. That's what I wanted to
emphasize. Thanks for making it clearer.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2019-04-10 11:51:01 Re: block-level incremental backup
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-04-10 10:13:07 Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage