| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |
| Date: | 2019-04-09 16:05:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20190409160518.olv7xji2ugw63j77@development |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:29:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 09:13:01PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Hmmm, what's the right status in the CF app when a part of a patch was
>> committed and the rest should be moved to the next CF? Committed, Moved
>> to next CF, or something else?
>
>This stuff has been around for nine commit fests, and you have been
>able to finish the basic work. So I think that committed is most
>appropriate so as you can start later on with a new concept, new patch
>sets, perhaps a new thread, and surely a new CF entry.
OK, makes sense. I'll start a new thread for the remaining pieces.
cheers
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2019-04-09 16:11:06 | Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-04-09 15:51:21 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |