Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date: 2019-04-06 07:13:53
Message-ID: 20190406071353.GC2145@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 11:31:31AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Yes, but Fujii-san pointed out that this option doesn't support toast
> tables and I think there is not specific reason why not supporting
> them. So it might be good to add toast.vacuum_index_cleanup. Attached
> patch.

Being able to control that option at toast level sounds sensible. I
have added an open item about that.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-06 07:18:48 Re: Re: A separate table level option to control compression
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-06 06:54:28 Re: Timeout parameters