| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <fabien(dot)coelho(at)mines-paristech(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
| Date: | 2019-03-29 14:01:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20190329140114.GH1954@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> I am not sure that "checksum status" is a correct term. It seems to
>> me that "same configuration for data checksums as before the tool ran"
>> or something like that would be more correct.
>
> Possibly, I cannot say.
I have put more thoughts into this part, and committed the
reorganization as you mainly suggested.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-29 14:03:49 | Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru |
| Previous Message | Ilaria | 2019-03-29 14:01:05 | Re: [GSoC 2019] Proposal: Develop Performance Farm Database and Website |