Re: Special role for subscriptions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Дмитрий Сарафанников <dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Владимир Бородин <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Subject: Re: Special role for subscriptions
Date: 2019-03-22 01:28:08
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:06:03AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> It will be really strange but I can live with that. Another idea is
> CREATE bit to create subscriptions (without replicate) and SUBSCRIBE
> bit to replicate tables. It is not just a privilege to create a
> subscription but also to modify tables that a role doesn't have
> explicit permission. Let's allocate another AclItem?

By the way, as the commit fest is coming to its end in a couple of
days, and that we are still discussing how the thing should be shaped,
I would recommend to mark the patch as returned with feedback. Any
objections with that?

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-22 02:05:46 Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-22 01:23:54 Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead follows log_file_mode permissions