Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, wufei(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module
Date: 2019-03-19 17:24:41
Message-ID: 20190319172441.vq6onnlgtpscjjdu@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-03-19 13:18:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Having said that ... a better argument for a new API is that it
> could be explicitly designed to handle multiple queries, and in
> particular make some provision for returning multiple PGresults.

Oh, I completely agree, that'd be hugely useful.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2019-03-19 17:28:08 Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module
Previous Message Jim Finnerty 2019-03-19 17:23:55 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?