Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
Date: 2019-02-20 11:47:01
Message-ID: 20190220114701.GA9206@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-20 <40c5c12f-adad-fc86-7d43-ff7c535356ed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> > By the same argument, it should always print which variant file was
> > used so determining which _N.out files are still in use is possible.
>
> I would rather not overload the test output even more. A test passes or
> it doesn't. If we need to collect additional information, let's think
> about ways to do that separately.

Aye. No objections.

Christoph

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2019-02-20 12:06:11 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2019-02-20 11:47:00 Re: SQL statement PREPARE does not work in ECPG