On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:31:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'd like to get that addressed before working on the other item
> reshuffling the CTAS relation creation. Let's wait for a couple of
> days and see if folks have objections, and then revisit it at the
> beginning of next week. CTAS IF NOT EXISTS is supported down to
> 9.5 and is documented as such, and my proposal is to back-patch
> accordingly.
Let's wait a bit more than the beginning of this week. I forgot about
this week's minor release, and it is too late to do something about
this report now, so we will have to wait until the release had
happened.
--
Michael