Re: Synchronize with imath upstream

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
Date: 2019-02-05 23:47:50
Message-ID: 20190205234750.GA2774@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Feb-03, David Fetter wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 07:07:36AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:

> > So far, expressed opinions have run about 4:2 in favour of allowing
> > mixed declarations and code.
>
> +1 for this.

Just curious, why do you care? If you want to use such constructs in
extension code, you can add it in your makefiles.

I'm -1 for this myself. I think there are a few places that could
benefit from it, but my fear is that many *more* places would get worse.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-02-06 00:09:32 Re: Internal error while setting reloption on system catalogs.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-05 22:50:34 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)