Re: Online verification of checksums

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Date: 2019-02-04 02:36:27
Message-ID: 20190204023627.GE1881@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:06:45AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-12-25 10:25:46 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> About added tests: the node is left running at the end of the script, which
>> is not very clean. I'd suggest to either move the added checks before
>> stopping, or to stop again at the end of the script, depending on the
>> intention.
>
> Michael?

Unlikely P., and most likely B.

I have marked the patch as returned with feedback as it has been a
couple of weeks already.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:37:46 Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 02:34:25 Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions