Re: tab-completion debug print

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tab-completion debug print
Date: 2019-02-02 01:28:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:07:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:53:49AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > My impression is that this patch ought to marked as rejected?
> I may be missing something, but I have the same impression.

Re-reading the thread I think that's too severe. Tom has mentioned
something interesting here:

So I am marking that stuff as returned with feedback.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:30:29 Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-02 01:24:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd)