Re: Commitfest delayed: extend it?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest delayed: extend it?
Date: 2019-01-11 00:53:16
Message-ID: 20190111005316.GB14237@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:44:34PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It has definitely started, at least for me :-)

Yes, there is no point in extending or delaying it.

> We're going to have a bit of a triage session in the FOSDEM dev's
> meeting, on Jan 31st, right at the end. I think that will be a good
> opportunity to give some final cleanup, and we should close it then or
> shortly thereafter.

A lot of folks are going to be there then (not me)? If it is possible
to get the CF closed more or less on time using this method that would
be nice.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2019-01-11 01:08:04 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-01-11 00:52:53 Re: Making WAL receiver startup rely on GUC context for primary_conninfo and primary_slot_name