Re: removal of dangling temp tables

On 2018-Dec-28, Tom Lane wrote:

> I wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> I looked at
> >> https://github.com/postgrespro/pg_wait_sampling/blob/master/pg_wait_sampling.c
> >> https://github.com/citusdata/citus/search?q=pgproc&unscoped_q=pgproc
> >> and skimmed a few others can't find any instance where the full struct
> >> is used, as opposed to just a pointer to it.
>
> > No, the point Michael is making is that the array stride in the ProcArray
> > is part of our ABI. For example, accessing a PGPROC from its pgprocno
> > using the GetPGProcByNumber macro will be broken if we change the
> > struct size. I do not think you can assume that no extension does that.
>
> In fact, there's a counterexample right here in pg_wait_sampling:
>
> https://github.com/postgrespro/pg_wait_sampling/blob/master/pg_wait_sampling.c#L343

Ughh. I stand corrected.

This seems a terrible interface, from an ABI compatibility point of
view, and exposing proclist_node_get() as an inline function, doubly so.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services