On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:55:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Thanks for the lookups. I can see that the patch applies without > conflicts down to 9.4, and based on the opinions gathered on this > thread back-patching this stuff is the consensus, based on input from > Kyotaro Horiguchi and David Steele (I don't mind much myself). So, > any objections from others in doing so?
On REL9_4_STABLE, IsTLHistoryFileName() goes missing, so committed "only" down to 9.5. Thanks David for the patch and Horiguchi-san for the review. -- Michael