| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixes for missing schema qualifications |
| Date: | 2018-11-29 07:20:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20181129072024.GB9004@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:18:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So based on the feedback here is what we could at least do now as a
> minimal fix set, in the shape of:
> - Patch functions in information_schema.sql, using either operator() or
> SET search_path.
> - Patch function qualifications I found here and there. Those are
> mainly one-liners, and gives readers better references for their own
> queries.
From what I can see in my backlog, this never actually got into the
tree, and it seems to me that fixing those issues is always better than
nothing:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180309075538.GD9376@paquier.xyz
Any thoughts? This does not reinvent the wheel..
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lætitia Avrot | 2018-11-29 07:26:49 | Re: Markdown format output for psql, design notes |
| Previous Message | Kato, Sho | 2018-11-29 07:17:20 | RE: Planning time of Generic plan for a table partitioned into a lot |