Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date: 2018-10-11 19:04:24
Message-ID: 20181011190424.gxgovoezirc5skgv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-10-09 17:39:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but:
> >> I do not think we should remove timeofday(). It's unrelated to these
> >> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated
> >> elsewhere.
>
> > Ok. I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly
> > related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c. Moving
> > it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense?
>
> Sure, if you want to flush nabstime.c completely, just shove it over
> there.

I've done that now, together with two commits for removal of timetravel
and abstime, reltime, tinterval.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-10-11 19:45:37 Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-10-11 17:41:57 Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction