| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Date: | 2018-09-28 03:03:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20180928030358.uitg4kfesfbs3uce@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-09-28 12:21:08 +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> Here I attached further cleanup patches.
> 1. Re-arrange the GUC variable
> 2. Added a check function hook for default_table_access_method GUC
Cool.
> 3. Added a new hook validate_index. I tried to change the function
> validate_index_heapscan to slotify, but that have many problems as it
> is accessing some internals of the heapscandesc structure and accessing
> the buffer and etc.
Oops, I also did that locally, in a way. I also made a validate a
callback, as the validation logic is going to be specific to the AMs.
Sorry for not pushing that up earlier. I'll try to do that soon,
there's a fair amount of change.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kato, Sho | 2018-09-28 03:08:40 | RE: Performance of the partitioning in the large scale |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-09-28 02:46:30 | Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal) |