| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xact_start meaning when dealing with procedures? |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 01:06:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20180816010622.GJ3681@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 06:23:40PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> This was added as an open item by Michael[1]. When the RMT discussed,
> we were able to make arguments both ways (i.e. adjusting the behavior vs.
> not).
>
> Peter, from your analysis it sounds like we should leave it, but I wanted to
> confirm before removing the open item.
FWIW, I am fine to stick with Peter's judgement. I added it as an open
item to actually have the discussion as I was not sure about the
intention with the feature.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-08-16 01:06:34 | Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-08-16 01:03:55 | Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views |