Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dian Fay <dian(dot)m(dot)fay(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views
Date: 2018-08-16 01:03:55
Message-ID: 20180816010355.GH3681@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:46:49PM -0400, Dian Fay wrote:
> hi all! I discovered today that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW documentation
> doesn't mention that only the owner (or a superuser) may actually perform
> the refresh operation. This patch adds a note to that effect.

I think that's a good idea. I would rewrite that a bit differently, like:
To refresh a materialized view, one must be the materalized view's owner
or a superuser.

Thougts or objections?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-08-16 01:06:22 Re: xact_start meaning when dealing with procedures?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-08-16 00:27:02 Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE