From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
Date: | 2018-08-15 15:56:43 |
Message-ID: | 20180815155643.zx4qpcmpvhemefyg@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 2018-Aug-15, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I'm almost tempted to think that the reasons above make this a
> > back-patchable bug fix. Comments?
>
> No objections to changing the behavior. Have you checked whether
> there are any noticeable performance consequences?
>
> Back-patching seems a bit aggressive to me considering that the danger
> is hypothetical.
That was my first thought too, and my preferred path would be to make
this master-only and only consider a backpatch later if we find some
practical reason to do so.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-08-15 16:01:28 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-08-15 15:56:20 | Re: libpq should append auth failures, not overwrite |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-08-15 16:01:28 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-15 15:52:37 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |