| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |
| Date: | 2018-08-02 19:30:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20180802193046.5bdk73tsjthzqqer@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-08-02 15:19:49 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Does anyone else want to weigh in on this? It seems to me that there
> are several people who are quite willing to complain about the fact
> that this hasn't been fixed, but not willing to express an opinion
> about the shape of the fix. Either the RMT needs to take executive
> action, or we need some more votes.
(taking my RMT hat off, as it's not been coordinated)
Well, I think it's enough in the weeds that not too many people are
going to have an informed opinion on this, and I'm not sure uninformed
opinions help. But I do think the fact that one of the authors and the
committer are on one side, and Tom seems to tentatively agree, weighs
quite a bit here. As far as I can tell, it's "just" Etsuro on the other
side - obviously his opinion counts, but it doesn't outweigh others. I
think if you feel confident, you should be ok just commit the approach
you favor, and I read you as being confident that that's the better
approach.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-08-02 19:38:11 | Re: [PATCH] Add regress test for pg_read_all_stats role |
| Previous Message | Simon Muller | 2018-08-02 19:30:26 | Re: Allow COPY's 'text' format to output a header |