Re: peripatus build failures....

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: peripatus build failures....
Date: 2018-07-07 00:53:23
Message-ID: 20180707005322.roklxivtfkoh6bco@ler-imac.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:18:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:40:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I do not like the "-Wl,-z,notext" thing at all. It fails to explain
> >> why things are working OK in v11/HEAD, which makes me think that it's
> >> band-aiding something rather than really fixing it.
>
> > Following the advice in the error message, the following ALSO fixes it
> > (REL_10_STABLE):
> > +override CFLAGS := -fPIC
>
> Yeah, I wondered about whether that wasn't a cleaner answer, but the same
> problem remains: if we need that in src/port/, why don't all the branches
> need it? It would be unsurprising if we'd gained a requirement for -fPIC
> somewhere along the line, but I don't entirely believe that we lost one.
> So I'd still like to know when this changed.
>
BROKE:0c62356cc8777961221a643fa77f62e1c7361085
GOOD: f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95

f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95 fixed it.

Here's the revs I tried:

BROKE:9d4649ca49416111aee2c84b7e4441a0b7aa2fac
GOOD: 3b8f6e75f3c8c6d192621f21624cc8cee04ec3cb
GOOD: 3a5e0a91bb324ad2b2b1a0623a3f2e37772b43fc
GOOD: 8989f52b1b0636969545e6c8f6c813bc563ebcf5
BROKE:0c62356cc8777961221a643fa77f62e1c7361085
GOOD: f044d71e331d77a0039cec0a11859b5a3c72bc95
> regards, tom lane

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-07-07 02:15:41 Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-07 00:19:06 Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type