| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2018-06-22 00:38:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20180622003819.GB3522@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I happened to notice that this patch was moved from Returned with Feedback to
> Needs Review after the CF closed, which means it’s now sitting open in a closed
> CF. The intended flow after RWF is that the patch is resubmitted, rather than
> status changed, but since it’s there now I guess we might as well move it to
> the current CF to make sure it’s not overlooked (which it will be in the
> current state)?
Indeed, done.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-22 00:48:15 | Re: PATCH: backtraces for error messages |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-06-22 00:24:45 | Re: PATCH: backtraces for error messages |