Re: partition -> partitioned

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partition -> partitioned
Date: 2018-06-20 03:59:00
Message-ID: 20180620035900.qhpgo655oipymw2v@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Jun-20, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch. Also,
> > made a minor update to a nearby comment.
>
> That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
> Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
> I? I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
> and "partition" have opposite meanings.

Hmm, will look.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-06-20 03:59:04 Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-06-20 03:52:49 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons