Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-05-09 21:08:47
Message-ID: 20180509210847.GD9303@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:39:07AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This removes a useless default clause in partprune.c and it got
>> forgotten in the crowd. Just attaching it again here, and it can just
>> be applied on top of the rest.
>
> Done, thanks for insisting.

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-05-09 22:55:55 Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-05-09 21:05:47 Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect