From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Date: | 2018-05-09 13:39:07 |
Message-ID: | 20180509133907.gs2tyxmefnuymb7p@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> Alvaro, could it be possible to consider as well the patch I posted
> here?
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180424012042.GD1570@paquier.xyz
>
> This removes a useless default clause in partprune.c and it got
> forgotten in the crowd. Just attaching it again here, and it can just
> be applied on top of the rest.
Done, thanks for insisting.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-09 13:43:33 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2018-05-09 13:08:49 | Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions |