Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Date: 2018-05-09 21:04:26
Message-ID: 20180509210426.GB9303@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the
> patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
> Peter's source of complaint, though. AFAICS your patch just adds test
> cases, and upthread discussion apparently converges on not doing
> anything about the code. I'm not yet sure what to think of that ...

Thanks Álvaro. I tend to think that there is little point in changing
the error handling, still it would be good to get test coverage. That's
not really a bug though as in all those cases we don't get errors like
"could not open file" or such. So we could also let things as they are
now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-05-09 21:05:47 Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-05-09 19:51:05 Re: parallel.sgml for Gather with InitPlans