| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 15:48:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20180407154845.qqwxa53m5lwg47u4@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-07 08:13:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > I've also attempted to fix rhinoceros's failure I remarked upon a couple
> > hours ago in
> > https://postgr.es/m/20180406210330.wmqw42wqgiicktli@alap3.anarazel.de
>
> And this, too. I was unsure if this was because we were missing calling
> some object access hook from the new code, or the additional pruning.
That's possible. I did attempt to skim the code, that's where my
complain about the docs originated. There certainly isn't an
InvokeFunctionExecuteHook() present. It's not clear to me whether
that's an issue - we don't invoke the hooks in a significant number of
places either, and as far as I can discern there's not much rule or
reason about where we invoke it.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-07 15:51:32 | Re: BUG #14999: pg_rewind corrupts control file global/pg_control |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-07 15:48:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |