Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Date: 2018-03-29 22:39:20
Message-ID: 20180329223920.aqby3gfp2u3x5fsy@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-03-29 09:59:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree. In some email threads Andres has been using "JIT" as a verb,
> too, such as "JITing expressions" and such; that's a bit shocking, in a
> way. Honestly I don't care in a pgsql-hackers thread, I mean we all
> understand what it means, but in user-facing docs and things we should
> use complete words, "JIT-compile", "JIT-compilation", "JIT-compiling"
> and so on.

FWIW, I don't think "JITing" or "JITed" appears anywhere in user facing
docs?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-29 23:13:59 pgsql: Improve JIT docs.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-03-29 20:22:53 pgsql: Remove 'target' from GroupPathExtraData.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2018-03-29 22:41:56 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-29 22:34:55 Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default