From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
Date: | 2018-03-29 22:39:20 |
Message-ID: | 20180329223920.aqby3gfp2u3x5fsy@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-03-29 09:59:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree. In some email threads Andres has been using "JIT" as a verb,
> too, such as "JITing expressions" and such; that's a bit shocking, in a
> way. Honestly I don't care in a pgsql-hackers thread, I mean we all
> understand what it means, but in user-facing docs and things we should
> use complete words, "JIT-compile", "JIT-compilation", "JIT-compiling"
> and so on.
FWIW, I don't think "JITing" or "JITed" appears anywhere in user facing
docs?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-29 23:13:59 | pgsql: Improve JIT docs. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-29 20:22:53 | pgsql: Remove 'target' from GroupPathExtraData. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2018-03-29 22:41:56 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-29 22:34:55 | Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default |