Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL
Date: 2018-03-20 18:55:29
Message-ID: 20180320185529.sf3wym5gdfnczd4m@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I wonder about adding a syscache callback so that when an item in
> > pg_partitioned_table is invalidated, the relcache entry for partrelid
> > entry in pg_class is invalidated also. I can't find any precedent for
> > anything similar, though, and there doesn't seem to be any convenient
> > place to do it, either.
>
> In principle you could do it by adding logic to CacheInvalidateHeapTuple
> in inval.c, similar to the existing logic for pg_class, pg_attribute
> and pg_index entries. Not sure it's worthwhile though. That's very
> ancient code; of late our practice has been to insist that the code
> modifying other catalogs that feed into relcache entries should issue
> a relcache inval explicitly. If there's a reason why it's not convenient
> to do that, then maybe making CacheInvalidateHeapTuple do it is a
> good way.

Actually, the current code uses CacheInvalidateRelcache() already and it
seems to work; I was looking for a better way that did not require us to
remember it for every update in that catalog, but it seems there isn't
one.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-20 19:16:23 pgsql: Make configure check for a couple more Perl modules for --enable
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-20 18:37:46 Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-20 18:59:02 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-20 18:50:38 Re: configure's checks for --enable-tap-tests are insufficient