Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Date: 2018-03-07 08:55:54
Message-ID: 20180307085553.GA5126@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Andres,

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:31:49PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Is there any chance we can instead can convert dictionaries into a form
> we can just mmap() into memory? That'd scale a lot higher and more
> dynamicallly?

To avoid misunderstanding can you please elaborate on using mmap()? The
DSM approach looks like more simple and requires less code. Also DSM may
use mmap() if I'm not mistaken.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-03-07 09:12:40 Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1)
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-03-07 08:25:45 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries