Re: Cached/global query plans, autopreparation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cached/global query plans, autopreparation
Date: 2018-02-14 17:45:51
Message-ID: 20180214174551.miyiwo3albueyodq@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-02-13 09:13:09 -0800, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> Was wondering if anyone has a reaction to my email below about statement
> preparation, was it too long? :)

Well, the issue is that implementing this is a major piece of work. This
post doesn't offer either resources nor a simpler way to do so. There's
no huge debate about the benefit of having a global plan cache, so I'm
not that surprised there's not a huge debate about a post arguing that
we should have one.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-02-14 17:50:04 Re: Google Summer of Code 2018
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-14 17:38:49 Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c