| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add more information_schema columns |
| Date: | 2018-02-13 23:01:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20180213230155.3rf3he6ypn677yfd@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-02-07 10:50:12 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/7/18 00:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I think what I had meant to write was something like
> >>
> >> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66))
> >>
> >> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
> >
> > If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the
> > formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that
> > ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
>
> Committed with the separate entries.
Do we have a policy about catversion bumps for information schema
changes? A cluster from before this commit fails the regression tests
after the change, but still mostly works...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2018-02-13 23:04:17 | Re: jsonpath |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-13 22:23:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Client Connection redirection support for PostgreSQL |