| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use |
| Date: | 2018-02-01 06:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20180201064659.GG6398@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:44:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. Coverage reports mark those areas as empty! Similarly the
> functions for record_* are mostly not used. Some tests could be added
> for them at the same time. The four error paths of those functions are
> tested as well, which is cool to see. Even if the buildfarm explodes
> after 0002 and 0003, 0001 is still a good addition. The set looks good
> to me by the way.
OK, so those have been committed as a61116d, 0b5e33f6 and a6ef00b5 for
the record. The last steps would be to:
- Introduce bool8 for catalogs.
- Address GinTernaryValue.
- Integrate stdbool.h.
Peter, are you planning to work on that for the next CF?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-02-01 06:51:53 | Re: Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-01 06:41:25 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Restricting pg_rewind to data/wal dirs |