Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp
Date: 2018-01-24 10:10:40
Message-ID: 20180124101040.GB23081@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Attached is a rebased v7 patch which has your amendments (minus
> propname) which passes make check without errors.

Confirmed. I am switching the status as ready for committer for
volatility-v7.patch then.

> The volatility patch is also rebased included, but there the
> discussion whether to keep or drop the deprecated syntax first needs
> to happen (started in your 20180115022748(dot)GB1724(at)paquier(dot)xyz mail).

Yes, let's see what happens later for this thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-01-24 10:53:04 Re: plpgsql function startup-time improvements
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-01-24 09:57:27 Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures