Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask
Date: 2018-01-24 02:22:41
Message-ID: 20180124022241.GB1355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:18:51AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/20/18 5:47 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Making this possible would require first some
>> refactoring of PostgresNode.pm so as a node is aware of the binary paths
>> it uses to be able to manipulate multiple instances with different
>> install paths at the same time.
>
> Any idea of what the LOE would be for that?

What does LOE means?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-24 02:27:29 Re: Handling better supported channel binding types for SSL implementations
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-01-24 02:19:26 Re: [PATCH] fix for C4141 warning on MSVC