| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section |
| Date: | 2018-01-24 00:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20180124003438.GC26207@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:36:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Can someone confirm this so I can apply this patch?
Never mind. I see this was applied:
doc: mention wal_receiver_status_interval as GUC affecting logical rep worker.
wal_receiver_timeout, wal_receiver_status_interval and
wal_retrieve_retry_interval configuration parameters affect the logical rep
worker, but previously only wal_receiver_status_interval was not mentioned
as such parameter in the doc.
Back-patch to v10 where logical rep was added.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBUnuH_UsnKXyPCsCR7EAMamW0sSb6a7=WgiQRpnMAp5w@mail.gmail.com
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-24 00:42:25 | Re: [PATCH] fix for C4141 warning on MSVC |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-24 00:31:20 | Re: [PATCH] fix for C4141 warning on MSVC |